Liquidity & Technical
Figures converted from TWD at historical FX rates — see data/company.json.fx_rates. Ratios, margins, and multiples are unitless and unchanged.
Liquidity & Technical
Tripod prints as institutionally tradable but size-aware: at twenty-percent participation a fund can put roughly $92 million to work in five trading days, which supports a 5% portfolio position for funds up to about $1.85 billion AUM and caps the largest issuer-level position that clears in five days at 1% of market cap. The tape is constructive on the multi-month view — price sits 41% above the 200-day with a fresh golden cross in June 2025 — but a near-term MACD bearish crossover and realized vol in the historically-stressed band say add patiently, not all at once.
1. Portfolio implementation verdict
5-day capacity at 20% ADV ($M)
Largest 5-day position (% of mcap)
Supported fund AUM, 5% wt @ 20% ADV ($M)
ADV 20d / Market cap
Tech stance score
Liquidity is workable but not deep enough to ignore. A 1% issuer position clears in five days at 20% ADV; anything above that needs participation discipline, time, or block facilitation. Tape is constructive on trend but bumpy near-term — add in stages rather than chase.
2. Price snapshot
Close ($)
YTD return
Auto-repair hid an invalid generated BigValue for price_strip because Evidence validation still reported chart_percentage_scale_mismatch. See review/repair/report-auto-repair.json for the original component.
52-week range position
Realized vol 30d
3. Ten-year price with 50/200 SMA
Most recent 50/200 cross was a golden cross on 2025-06-20, the second of the year (an April death cross was reversed within ten weeks). Price closed today at $15.46 — above the 200-day SMA by 41.5% and above the 50-day by 17.3%.
This is an uptrend. The 200-day has been rising monotonically since June 2025, the 50-day re-took the 200-day in late June, and price has more than doubled in the twelve months since June 2025. The decade-long base from 2016–2023 set a ceiling near $6.50; the breakout above that level in mid-2024 has now extended to a 2.5× move, with today's close near the upper third of the 52-week range.
4. Relative strength vs benchmark
No benchmark comparable was loaded for this Taiwan-listed name (broad-market SPY rebased line was not populated and no Taiwan sector ETF is in scope). Absolute returns proxy the strength signal: +56% YTD, +160% over twelve months, and +334% over three years materially outpace TAIEX, MSCI Taiwan, and most Asian technology benchmarks over the same windows. Strength is unambiguous; the question is whether it can extend, not whether it exists.
5. Momentum — RSI(14) and MACD histogram
RSI sits at 57.8 — neutral. The interesting signal is the MACD histogram: it just printed the first meaningful negative bar (−5.4) after a sharp April-rally that peaked at +11.1 on 2026-04-27. Both the late-July 2025 RSI peak (83.6) and the late-April 2026 RSI peak (81.1) preceded multi-week pullbacks of 7–10%. Near-term momentum is rolling over from an overbought condition; trend is intact but a digestion phase is the base case.
6. Volume, volatility, and sponsorship
50-day average daily volume has stepped up from roughly 2.0 million shares in May 2025 to 5.0 million shares today — a 2.5× increase that confirms institutional sponsorship is following the breakout, not fading it. The biggest recent prints (11.6M on 2025-07-21, 11.1M on 2026-04-27, 9.4M on 2026-05-14) coincide with up-days, which is the bullish polarity.
The three largest historical volume multiples all clustered in 2019, when the stock was a sub-$5 name with an average baseline below 2.5M shares. The 7×-of-average prints from that era are not directly comparable to today's tape — the float and institutional sponsorship have changed materially since the 2023–2024 breakout. The more relevant recent reference point is the 50-day average, which is now running at roughly $82 million of daily value (5.0M shares × $16-ish), versus $9 million in early 2024.
Realized 30-day volatility prints at 56.8% — above the ten-year 80th percentile of 40.8%, and within sight of the 2023-AI-cycle peaks (54–59%) and the post-tariff April 2025 spike (67%). The market is pricing this as a higher-risk-premium name today than it has 80% of the time in the past decade. Position sizing should be scaled down accordingly relative to a "normal-vol" PCB peer.
7. Institutional liquidity panel
This section is written for buy-side firms. The question is not "is liquidity adequate?" — it is "what size, on what timeline, and at what fund AUM?"
ADV and turnover
ADV 20d (M shares)
ADV 20d value ($M)
ADV 60d (M shares)
ADV / Market cap
Auto-repair hid an invalid generated BigValue for adv_strip because Evidence validation still reported chart_percentage_scale_mismatch. See review/repair/report-auto-repair.json for the original component.
ADV 20d is 24% higher than ADV 60d (5.97M vs 4.68M shares) — liquidity is accelerating in step with the rally, not contracting. Annual turnover of 200% places this comfortably in the actively-traded mid-cap bucket for the Taiwan exchange.
Fund-capacity table — supported AUM by position weight
Reading the table: a fund with $1.85 billion AUM can build a 5% position in five trading days at 20% participation. A fund with $920 million AUM can build the same 5% position at the more conservative 10% participation. For a 10% concentrated position, the AUM ceiling drops to $920 million (20% ADV) or $460 million (10% ADV). This is a name for mid-sized Asia-focused funds and family offices; mega-cap Asian funds ($6B+) would face material price impact.
Liquidation runway — days to exit
The 5-day clean-exit threshold sits at exactly 1.0% of market cap ($81M / 5.26M shares) at 20% participation. Above that, exit windows extend rapidly — a 2% position needs nine trading days at aggressive participation or three-and-a-half weeks at the more institutional 10% rate. The implication for entry: a fund that wants to be able to walk away in a week should cap its issuer-level position near 1% of Tripod's market cap, regardless of its own portfolio weight.
Intraday range as impact proxy
Median 60-day daily range is 4.45% — well above the 2% "elevated impact" threshold. This is not a smooth name to execute in; the wide intraday range means VWAP execution and limit-order discipline are mandatory for any block of meaningful size, and naive market-order participation will leak performance.
8. Technical scorecard and stance
Net stance: mildly bullish on the 3-to-6 month horizon, but constructive add rather than aggressive build. The combination of a rising 200-day, fresh golden cross, accelerating volume, and three-figure-percent year-on-year returns argues the trend is intact; the combination of stressed realized volatility, a fresh MACD bearish crossover, and a price already sitting in the upper third of the 52-week range argues the path will not be a straight line. The price levels that change the view are clear:
- Bull confirmation: a decisive weekly close above $16.47. That breaks the $17.17 52-week / all-time high and turns prior resistance into support; a base of higher highs above the $15.40–16.50 zone would extend the trend.
- Bear invalidation: a weekly close below $13.18 (the 50-day SMA). That breaks the steepening trendline that has held since the June 2025 golden cross and would put the $10.93 200-day SMA — 29% below current price — back into play as the next test.
Liquidity is not the constraint for funds up to roughly $1.9 billion AUM building a 5% position, but liquidity becomes the binding constraint above $4.6 billion AUM. For implementable funds the correct action is build in stages over multiple weeks — pair entries with the next 10–15% pullback toward the 50-day rather than chase the breakout, given the elevated vol regime and overbought near-term momentum.